Analysis reveals that multi-trace expectations do not scale as expected in Gaussian random tensors, highlighting key differences from random matrices.
We consider real tensors of order D, that is D-dimensional arrays of real numbers Ta¹a² aD, where each index aᶜ can take N values. The tensor entries Ta¹a² aD have no symmetry properties under permutations of the indices. The invariant polynomials built out of the tensor entries are called trace invariants. We prove that for a Gaussian random tensor with D≥ 3 indices (that is such that the entries Ta¹a² aD are independent identically distributed Gaussian random variables) the cumulant, or connected expectation, of a product of trace invariants is not always suppressed in scaling in N with respect to the product of the expectations of the individual invariants. Said otherwise, not all the multi-trace expectations factor at large N in terms of the single-trace ones and the Gaussian scaling is not subadditive on the connected components. This is in stark contrast to the $D=2$ case of random matrices in which the multi-trace expectations always factor at large N. The best one can do for D≥ 3 is to identify restricted families of invariants for which the large N factorization holds and we check that this indeed happens when restricting to the family of melonic observables, the dominant family in the large N limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurău et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: