PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Acoustic Waveform Inversion with Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridges

View Full Paper
ASAndrey StankevichИПИ. Б. Петров

Key Points

  • The proposed conditional Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge shows significant improvements in reconstructing velocity models.
  • This method requires fewer neural function evaluations to achieve high sample fidelity compared to supervised learning approaches.
  • By interpolating between distributions, the framework optimally incorporates velocity models in the inversion process.
  • This analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of using diffusion-based models in acoustic waveform inversion strategies.

Abstract

Recent developments in application of deep learning models to acoustic Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) are marked by the use of diffusion models as prior distributions for Bayesian-like inference procedures. The advantage of these methods is the ability to generate high-resolution samples, which are otherwise unattainable with classical inversion methods or other deep learning-based solutions. However, the iterative and stochastic nature of sampling from diffusion models along with heuristic nature of output control remain limiting factors for their applicability. For instance, an optimal way to include the approximate velocity model into diffusion-based inversion scheme remains unclear, even though it is considered an essential part of FWI pipeline. We address the issue by employing a Schrödinger Bridge that interpolates between the distributions of ground truth and smoothed velocity models. To facilitate the learning of nonlinear drifts that transfer samples between distributions we extend the concept of Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge (I²SB) to conditional sampling, resulting in a conditional Image-to-Image Schrödinger Bridge (cI²SB) framework. To validate our method, we assess its effectiveness in reconstructing the reference velocity model from its smoothed approximation, coupled with the observed seismic signal of fixed shape. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed solution outperforms our reimplementation of conditional diffusion model suggested in earlier works, while requiring only a few neural function evaluations (NFEs) to achieve sample fidelity superior to that attained with supervised learning-based approach. The supplementary code implementing the algorithms described in this paper can be found in the repository https: //github. com/stankevich-mipt/seismicᵢnversionᵥiaI2SB.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stankevich et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f6379bb481a140a36cf741https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.15346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accelerating Bayesian full waveform inversion using reconstruction-guided diffusion sampling2026
  2. 2Bidirectional Physics-Constrained Full Waveform Inversion: Reducing Seismic Data Dependency in Velocity Model Building2025
  3. 3Full-waveform variational inference with full common-image gathers and diffusion network2025
  4. 4Implicit full waveform inversion imaging2026
  5. 5Stochastic full waveform inversion with deep generative prior for uncertainty quantification2024 · 1 citations