PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20250 citationsOpen Access

From Model to Classroom: Evaluating Generated MCQs for Portuguese with Narrative and Difficulty Concerns

View Full Paper
BLBernardo LeiteHCHenrique Lopes CardosoPPPedro Vaz Pinto

Key Points

  • Generated MCQs showed comparable quality to human-authored ones, yet issues with clarity emerged.
  • Expert reviews indicated that while generative models produced valid questions, answerability was inconsistent.
  • The evaluation utilized psychometric properties based on student responses, focusing on multiple difficulty levels.
  • Further work is needed to enhance distractor engagement and adhere to established MCQ design criteria.

Abstract

While MCQs are valuable for learning and evaluation, manually creating them with varying difficulty levels and targeted reading skills remains a time-consuming and costly task. Recent advances in generative AI provide an opportunity to automate MCQ generation efficiently. However, assessing the actual quality and reliability of generated MCQs has received limited attention -- particularly regarding cases where generation fails. This aspect becomes particularly important when the generated MCQs are meant to be applied in real-world settings. Additionally, most MCQ generation studies focus on English, leaving other languages underexplored. This paper investigates the capabilities of current generative models in producing MCQs for reading comprehension in Portuguese, a morphologically rich language. Our study focuses on generating MCQs that align with curriculum-relevant narrative elements and span different difficulty levels. We evaluate these MCQs through expert review and by analyzing the psychometric properties extracted from student responses to assess their suitability for elementary school students. Our results show that current models can generate MCQs of comparable quality to human-authored ones. However, we identify issues related to semantic clarity and answerability. Also, challenges remain in generating distractors that engage students and meet established criteria for high-quality MCQ option design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leite et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f6379bb481a140a36cf812https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2506.15598
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper