Retrospective cohort analysis revealed complications in redo frozen elephant trunk procedures for aortic dissection, indicating surgical challenges and risks.
Objective. To evaluate the results of redo frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedures after previous surgical correction of acute aortic dissection type I. Material and methods. A retrospective cohort analysis included 97 patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection who underwent FET procedures between 2016 and 2025. Patients were divided into two groups depending on intervention: group 1 (n=45) — repeated patients who underwent previous surgical correction of acute type I aortic dissection, group 2 (n=52) — patients with acute type 1 aortic dissection who underwent previous radical treatment. Early postoperative results were analyzed. Results. Significant differences were obtained for some parameters: length of hospital-stay (p=0.0471), intraoperative parameters, incidence of infectious complications (p=0.028), recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries (p=0.001), as well as total number of complications (p=0.019). In addition, there was significantly higher incidence of distal aortic repair in the group of repeated interventions (p=0.033). Conclusion. Redo aortic arch surgery is still difficult with high risk of complications and negative distal aortic remodeling despite acceptable results in experienced centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charchyan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: