Long-term study demonstrates that legume-based systems improve soil health and economic efficiency in rice-wheat rotations.
Prolonged cultivation of the rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) has led to soil degradation, groundwater depletion, and reduced input use efficiency, necessitating resilient and diversified cropping systems. Therefore, a 6-year field experiment (from 2017–2018 to 2022–2023) was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), Ludhiana, Punjab, India, using a randomized complete block design with four replications to evaluate 10 cropping systems (CS). The results revealed that the legume-integrated cropping system of maize–peas–spring groundnut (CS6), being statistically at par with other legume-based systems (i.e., CS3, CS4, CS5, and CS8), showed a significantly lower bulk density (1.32 g/cm 3 ) and higher availability of macronutrients [nitrogen (250.88 kg/ha), phosphorus (27.87 kg/ha), and potassium (194.12 kg/ha)] and micronutrients [zinc (2.85 mg/kg), iron (25.02 mg/kg), copper (2.67 mg/kg), and manganese (12.35 mg/kg)], as well as a substantially improved soil biological health, as indicated by the increased microbial populations [bacteria (132.56 × 10 6 CFU/g), fungi (25.34 × 10 3 CFU/g), actinomycetes (35.01 × 10 4 CFU/g), and diazotrophs (97.32 × 10 4 CFU/g)], enzymatic activity [dehydrogenase (62.22 µg TPF/g soil/h), alkaline phosphatase (10.78 µg PNP/g soil/h), and urease (16.96 µ/g soil/h)], and microbial biomass carbon (255.21 mg/kg) and nitrogen (20.01 mg/kg). The correlation analysis showed significant interrelationships ( p ≤ 0.01 and 0.05), while the principal component analysis (PCA) identified the legume-based systems as key contributors to improved soil health. The cropping system CS6 produced 68.97% higher rice equivalent yield (199.88 q/ha) than the rice–wheat system (118.29 q/ha), consequently resulting in higher gross returns (₹391,770/ha), net returns (₹233,193/ha), benefit/cost (BC) ratio (1.47), and economic efficiency (₹639/ha/day), making it the most economically and ecologically sustainable system recommended for adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: