VandenHombergh finds autonomy-centred laws inadequate against expressivism in assisted death, suggesting deeper implications.
Jonathon VandenHombergh argues in this journal that the expressivist objection against assisted death cannot be avoided by appealing to autonomy-centred assisted death laws. He claims that these laws need to appeal to a person’s motivations for requesting assisted death and that judgments that these motivations are reasonable will express a message of disrespect for similarly-situated individuals. I argue that VandenHombergh’s article errs in at least two respects. First, certain kinds of motivations are relevant to our assessment of a person being capable of making any autonomous decision. Second, laws can remain silent about motivations for seeking assisted death, easily avoiding the expressivist objection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip A. Reed (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: