Study explores the dynamic expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in oral squamous cell carcinoma, indicating its role in neoplastic progression.
To systematically characterizes the temporal changes in urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) over the course of neoplastic progression using a mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) model induced by 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO). A total of 65 wild-type C57BL/6 mice of 5 weeks old were randomly assigned to two groups, a 4-NQO group (n = 50), which received daily administration of 100 μg/mL 4-NQO in drinking water, and a control group (n = 15), which received sterile water. At 12, 16, 20, 22, and 24 weeks, 10 mice from the 4-NQO group and 3 from the control group were randomly selected, weighed, and sacrificed. Tongue tissues were collected for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining to preliminarily assess OSCC development, and for immunofluorescence staining and quantitative real-time PCR to evaluate dynamic uPA expression in tongue tissues during OSCC progression. After 16 weeks of exposure, 4-NQO-treated mice exhibited significantly lower body mass compared with that of the controls (P < 0.05) and the weight loss became increasingly more pronounced over time. Histopathological changes in tongue tissues progressed in a clearly time-dependent manner-hyperplasia and mild dysplasia emerged at week 12, while moderate-to-severe dysplasia and carcinoma were observed by week 22, yielding a tumorigenic rate of 25%, which escalated to 70% by week 24. Immunofluorescence and qPCR analyses demonstrated a pronounced, progressive up-regulation of uPA expression in lesional tissues as OSCC progressed (P < 0.0001). This study not only confirmed the uniqueness of the 4-NQO model in OSCC research, but also revealed the changes in uPA during tumor invasion. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for the development of early diagnosis and precision treatment strategies, holding significant potential clinical value and research importance for improving patient prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: