Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis shows reduced LDL cholesterol and improved left ventricular ejection fraction post myocardial infarction, highlighting the role of secondary prevention.
The Coordinated Care Program in Patients after Myocardial Infarction (KOS-MI) has substantially reduced mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations through its comprehensive approach, including unlimited rehabilitation, cardiologist ambulatory care, complete revascularization, and electrotherapy in various long-term studies. This study evaluated the outcomes and adherence to secondary preventive measures in patients who completed the KOS-MI Program 1 year and 3 years after myocardial infarction. We conducted a retrospective registry involving 331 myocardial infarction patients who participated in the KOS-MI Program. Baseline and follow-up data included laboratory results (low density-lipoprotein (LDL) and glucose levels), echocardiography assessments, and drug compliance records. At 12 months, 79.2% of patients (n = 262) had completed the program. Among them, 69.1% were men, and 46.2% presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Complete revascularization was achieved in 55.7% of cases. Patients engaged in stationary or ambulatory rehabilitation constituted 56.1% and 43.9%, respectively. Notably, LDL levels significantly decreased from 129 mg/dl to 85.8 mg/dl (p < 0.001), with 19.1% of cases achieving the LDL goal of < 55 mg/dl. An HbA1c level below 7% was achieved by only 49% of diabetes patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed a statistically significant improvement (48.3% vs. 56.1%; p = 0.001). Drug adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy was 100%, while statin adherence was 99.6%. The KOS-MI Program has significantly reduced LDL cholesterol levels and improved LVEF, especially in patients with the lowest initial LVEF. Future research should focus on optimizing LDL management and exploring long-term outcomes related to left ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: