Key result
Participation in the Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction program reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 45% (HR 0.476) at 3 months compared to standard care.
Why the study?
Despite low in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction, post-discharge prognosis remains unacceptable, prompting evaluation of the Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction program.
Does the comprehensive Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) program reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,058)
No
Does the comprehensive Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) program reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.476 (95% CI 0.283–0.799)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.9% vs 8.9%
Number Needed to Treat: 25.2
p-value: p=<0.005
A comprehensive managed care and rehabilitation program after acute myocardial infarction significantly reduced the 3-month risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 45% compared to standard care.
May support structured post-MI programs; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Despite progress in medical and interventional treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting in low in-hospital mortality, the post-discharge prognosis in MI survivors is still unacceptable. The Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI, KOS-zawał) is a program introduced by Poland's National Health Fund aiming at comprehensive care for patients with AMI to improve prognosis. It includes acute intervention, complex revascularization, cardiac rehabilitation (CR), scheduled outpatient follow-up, and prevention of sudden cardiac death. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of MC-AMI on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in 3-month follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective observational study we enrolled 1211 patients, and compared them to 1130 subjects in the control group. After 1 : 1 propensity score matching two groups of 529 subjects each were compared. Cox regression was performed to assess the effect of MC-AMI and other variables on MACE. RESULTS: < 0.005). Also, older age, male sex (HR = 2.0), history of unstable angina (HR = 3.15), peripheral artery disease (HR = 2.17), peri-MI atrial fibrillation (HR = 1.87) and diabetes (HR = 1.5) were significantly associated with MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in MC-AMI - the first comprehensive in-hospital and post-discharge care for AMI patients - improves prognosis and is related to a MACE rate reduction by 45% as soon as in 3 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wita et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=1,058). Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MC-AMI) vs. Standard care (historical control) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of death, recurrent MI, and hospitalization for heart failure) (HR 0.476, 95% CI 0.283-0.799, p=<0.005). Participation in the Managed Care in Acute Myocardial Infarction program reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 45% (HR 0.476) at 3 months compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: