Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiments reveal the impact of different coal gangue sand ratios on concrete microstructures, indicating performance shifts.
Coal gangue manufactured sand (CGS), a sustainable substitute for natural sand, offers both resource and environmental benefits; however, the micro-mechanisms underlying performance deterioration at different replacement levels remain unclear. In this study, cube specimens with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% CGS were tested in uniaxial compression, and the results were integrated with PFC2D discrete-element simulations and SEM observations to establish an energy–force-chain–crack coupling framework. Experiments and simulations showed close agreement in peak stress, peak strain, and overall curve shape (errors generally <5%). With increasing replacement, the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) evolves from a dense three-phase ITZ (NS–CGS–CA; natural sand–CGS–coarse aggregate) to a degraded two-phase ITZ (CGS–CA), accompanied by more pores and microcracks; the proportion of Adhesive cracks decreases while Cohesive (intra-particle) cracks increase. Concurrently, continuous force-chain networks deteriorate into localized short-chain clusters; the peak and fraction of strain-energy decrease, whereas frictional/damping dissipation rises—together driving a macroscopic transition from ductile to brittle behavior. At 28 d, SEM images and DEM evolution of cracks/force chains/energy exhibit strong consistency, further confirming that low replacement (25% and 50%) favors stable load-transfer paths and suppresses early cracking, whereas high replacement (75% and 100%)—through ITZ degradation and force-chain instability—induces more concentrated cracking and higher energy dissipation, thereby diminishing mechanical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: