Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research demonstrates eddy-current methods can analyze subsurface temperature distribution, suggesting improved thermal monitoring capabilities.
Eddy-current (EC) nondestructive evaluation has a long history of use in a variety of ex situ defect monitoring applications because of its exquisite sensitivity to local material variations. Due to the relationship between a material's conductivity and its temperature, EC methods have also been used to investigate quasistatic, long-range temperature variations in casting applications. However, these techniques remain underutilized for the measurement of rapidly varying, spatially nonuniform temperature distributions. In this work, we construct a model system capable of generating repeatable temperature transients in steel plates and measure real-time eddy-current signals with millisecond time resolution and spatial resolution of the order of 1 mm. Using a combination of Multiphysics simulations, fast thermal imaging, and time-resolved holographic interferometry, we tease apart contributions to the eddy-current signals arising from temperature variations and transient plate deformation. Finally, we perform a systematic study in which we vary the plate thickness and the eddy-current excitation frequency to demonstrate that eddy-current techniques can provide information about a three-dimensional, time-varying, subsurface thermal distribution, which is inaccessible to the traditional thermal imaging techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenberg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: