This study demonstrates zircon dating findings of 187–174 Ma in metabasic rocks, suggesting oceanic alteration and tectonic significance.
Metabasic rocks (eclogites and amphibolites) from four Betic ophiolite outcrops (Lugros, Almirez, Cóbdar, and Algarrobo), comprising Ol-Px gabbros, dolerites, and MORB-affinity basalts, were studied. U-Pb SHRIMP zircon dating yielded Early to Middle Jurassic ages (187–174 Ma). At Cóbdar and Algarrobo, several magmatic levels were identified (187 ± 1.7 to 174 ± 1.8 Ma, and 184 ± 1.8 to 180 ± 1.6 Ma, respectively). In Lugros, two gabbros were dated to 187 ± 2.5 and 184 ± 1.4 Ma, while a dolerite dyke intruding serpentinites in Almirez gave 184 ± 1.6 Ma. Algarrobo xenocrystic zircons, predominantly Precambrian, resemble those from the MAR (13° N–15° N) in age and chemistry, suggesting a similar tectonic setting. δ18O values (4.2–6.2‰) of Betic ophiolite zircons (gabbros, basalts, dolerites) match those of MAR and SWIR samples, reflecting also oceanic alteration. Some zircons preserve δ18O variations linked to Jurassic (~150 Ma) oceanic metamorphism and later orogenic overprints. REE patterns show depletions in HREE and Y, with localized enrichments in LREE and Hf, which are more marked in metamorphically recrystallized zones. Xenocrystic zircons may derive from Precambrian protoliths assimilated during Jurassic magma ascent near transform faults. This integrated geochronological and geochemical evidence provides the key constraints for a revised geodynamic framework, confirming the existence of a Betic Jurassic ocean basin, which is a crucial precursor to the Alpine orogenic events that shaped the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: