Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical trial evaluates 3D modelling effectiveness versus X-ray and CT in tibial plateau fractures, highlighting significant time and control frequency reductions.
Background. Preoperative planning is an important stage that allows you to determine intraoperative actions, helps to choose a rational approach, materials and implants necessary for reduction and fixation of fractures, to establish the amount of bone loss. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing fractures of the proximal epimetaphysis of the tibia and to evaluate the effectiveness of using 3D technologies in surgical treatment. Material and methods. The clinical study was based on the examination and treatment of 91 patients with fractures of the proximal epimetaphysis of the tibia from 2014 to 2024. To improve the quality of preoperative planning, the Mimics program (from Materialise) was utilized. Results. Tibial plateau fractures were most common in working-age individuals aged 31 to 60 years (62.6 %). Іn intra-articular fractures of the proximal epimetaphysis of the tibia without displacement, the reliable diagnosis with computed tomography was 92.9 %, with X-ray examination — 57.1 % (p = 0.03), and in cases of displacement of fragments — 98.5 and 80.0 % (p = 0.002), respectively. The use of 3D modelling (study group) resulted in a reduction in operative time (102.4 vs. 126.2 minutes; p < 0.01) and a decrease in the frequency of intraoperative radiological control (3.2 vs. 5.2 times; p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference in the functional outcome of treatment was found. Conclusion. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are characterized by a sufficiently high informativeness in these fractures. 3D modelling allows for a 36.9 % reduction in the time of surgical intervention and a 61.5 % reduction in the frequency of intraoperative radiological control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burianov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: