Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals distinct advantages and limitations of empirical correlations and modern models in rock mass evaluation.
The deformation modulus is a key parameter in the design of underground structures, but its accurate estimation is often challenging due to the heterogeneity of rock masses. This paper provides an overview of the most commonly used methods – from empirical correlations (RMR, GSI,Q) to modern models based on analytical approaches and artificial intelligence. By comparing methods proposed by various authors, their advantages and limitations are highlighted, along with factors influencing the reliability of estimation in engineering practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milan Tumara (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: