Explosion tests reveal shock wave behavior and load distribution in T-shaped tunnels, indicating design implications for protective features.
The study focuses on the T-shaped tunnel scenario with protective doors, performs explosion tests using aluminized explosives, and investigates the propagation patterns and loading characteristics of explosion shock waves in the straight tunnel, at the T-shaped junction, and within the semi-enclosed space in front of the protective door. It was observed that, in comparison to TNT explosives, the overpressure curve of aluminized explosives in the near-explosion zone exhibited a two- batch characteristic. The second batch presented the maximum overpressure peak. In contrast, in the far zone, the curve displayed a stable triangular waveform. In the main tunnel of the T-shaped opening with protective doors, it was found that the back blast surface located in front of the entrance to the main tunnel experienced the maximum momentum, which could be as high as 12 times greater than that of the reflection area on the blast-facing surface at the entrance of the main tunnel and the shock-wave pressure wave pattern can be divided into four batch. The regularities of each measurement point in multiple tests show consistency, highlighting the influence laws of the geometric structure on the wave pattern and load distribution. In addition, this paper integrates LS-DYNA numerical simulation with aerodynamics theory to reveal that shock waves generate expansion waves and oblique shock waves as they pass through the T-shaped opening. After two reflections off the main tunnel wall and the door, a stable propagation waveform is established. In addition, through dimensional analysis and in combination with the experimental results, the momentum at key positions was analyzed and predicted. This study offers a reference for the design of relevant engineering protection measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: