This methodology enhances energy efficiency and carbon capture in lithium battery production, suggesting improved process scheduling and recovery strategies.
The rising penetration of electric vehicles is driving huge demand for lithium batteries, making low-carbon manufacturing a critical objective. This goal is challenged by insufficient production scheduling flexibility and the neglect of carbon-reduction technologies. To address these challenges, this paper develops a low-carbon planning methodology for lithium battery plant energy systems by leveraging manufacturing chain flexibilities. First, a lithium battery energy–carbon material modeling approach is developed that accounts for process production delays and intermediate product storage to capture schedulable process energy consumption patterns. A nitrogen–oxygen coupling production framework is introduced to facilitate oxygen-enriched combustion technology application, while energy recovery pathways are incorporated given the high energy consumption of the formation stage. Subsequently, a process scheduling-driven planning model for lithium battery industrial integrated energy systems (IIES) is developed. Finally, the planning model is validated through four contrasting case studies and systematically evaluated using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The results demonstrate three principal conclusions: (1) incorporating process scheduling effectively enhances process energy flexibility and reduces total system costs by 19.4%, with MCDA closeness coefficient improving from 0.257 to 0.665; (2) oxygen-enriched combustion increases maximum combustion and carbon capture (CCS) rates from 90% to 95%, reducing carbon tax to 40.5% of the baseline; (3) energy recovery on the basis of process scheduling further reduces costs and carbon emissions, with battery recovery achieving an additional 30.2% cost reduction compared to 24.1% for heat recovery, and MCDA identifies this integrated approach as the optimal solution with a closeness coefficient of 0.919.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: