Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review demonstrates the role of sarcopenia in predicting mortality and procedural outcomes, highlighting its significance in interventional radiology.
Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is a common and critical comorbidity in patients with conditions frequently managed by interventional radiologists, such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Interventional radiologists are uniquely positioned to perform opportunistic screening for this condition using routine pre-procedural cross-sectional imaging. This review provides the current evidence on the impact of sarcopenia on patient outcomes and procedural planning across a range of key interventional radiology (IR) procedures. In transarterial embolizations for HCC, sarcopenia is a robust independent predictor of increased mortality, with meta-analyses suggesting it may also predict a lower tumor response rate. Even earlier stages of muscle loss (pre-sarcopenia) are associated with worse survival, and dynamic changes in muscle mass post-treatment can serve as a biomarker for tumor progression. For patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, pre-procedural sarcopenia and myosteatosis are strong, independent predictors of both mortality and the development of post-procedural hepatic encephalopathy, with the presence of both conferring the highest risk. In the context of pre-surgical portal vein embolization, sarcopenia is consistently associated with impaired volumetric liver growth, although this does not always translate to worse short-term surgical outcomes, as functional liver regeneration may be preserved. Following percutaneous liver tumor ablation, sarcopenia is a powerful predictor of overall mortality, while its role in predicting tumor recurrence remains an area of active investigation. Finally, in non-oncologic interventions for peripheral arterial disease, sarcopenia is highly prevalent and is associated with worse functional status, higher mortality, and a significantly increased risk of major amputation after endovascular therapy. In conclusion, sarcopenia is a powerful and readily available biomarker that provides crucial prognostic information—often independent of standard clinical scores—across a wide spectrum of IR procedures. The consistent evidence supports integrating sarcopenia evaluation into routine practice to enhance risk stratification, improve patient counseling, and guide multidisciplinary treatment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyeon Yu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: