Analysis reveals trends in competition law enforcement affecting state and municipal preferences, highlighting control measures.
The practice of the antimonopoly authorities in the research years shows that the institution of state and municipal preferences is experiencing a new round of its development, which is accompanied by both — a fairly active improvement of the antimonopoly legislation itself, and an improvement in the practice of applying Chapter 5 of the Law on the Protection of Competition, including through significant explanatory work aimed at strengthening control over the use of the granted preferences. Based on the results of the analysis of law enforcement and judicial practice, the author draws conclusions about the main trends associated with the provision of state and municipal preferences, as well as about the reasons and prerequisites for the more active use of restrictions by the antimonopoly authority when coordinating the provision of preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anton V. Teslenko (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: