Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into corporate strategies has become a central theme in management, finance, and accounting research. However, the literature on the "value relevance" of ESG disclosure and its relationship with performance and valuation remains fragmented, with divergent theories and results. Mapping this field is essential to systematize conceptual foundations, highlight dominant research streams, and identify gaps shaping the debate on ESG as a driver of corporate value. The aim of this study is to explores the evolution of academic research on ESG, disclosure, performance, and valuation, focusing on how ESG has been conceptualized as a factor of competitiveness and long-term value creation. The hypothesis that underlies research is that the relevance of ESG in determining the market value has expanded since the global financial crisis, with literature shifting from descriptive approaches to analytical and performance-based assessments. Hence, the ESG factors are assuming growing attention in business valuation domain. Methodology: a bibliometric analysis was conducted using Web of Science; with VOSviewer, the study maps co-citation networks, co-occurrence of keywords, and semantic clustering to identify main theoretical streams, influential journals, authors, and emerging topics in the ESG-value relevance debate. Findings reveal distinct research clusters showing that ESG integration enhances reputation and market valuation, especially when supported by strong governance and incentives. Key themes include double materiality, impact investing, and executive compensation tied to ESG metrics, with evidence that ESG-linked pay fosters measurable improvements in sustainability outcomes, though short-term financial effects remain mixed. ESG strategies, steadily evolving from a voluntary practice aimed a legitimation of the firm to a determinant of competitiveness and business value. Such evolution is reshaping academic inquiry and corporate valuation models while enhancing long-term value creation philosophy
Rupo et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: