Analysis demonstrates frequency differences in color terms in English and Chinese, highlighting cognitive influences.
Color terms are important symbols in language that record human perception of the world, carrying both objective descriptive functions and rich cultural meta-phorical meanings. English and Chinese exhibit significant differences in the usage of color terms, especially concerning grammatical transcategorization (shifting from nouns or adjectives to verbs). Based on the statistical findings of Liao Zhenggang (2011) from large corpora (COCA, CCL), and combined with cognitive linguistic theories, this paper explores the cognitive motivations be-hind the frequency differences in the grammatical transcategorization of basic color terms between English and Chinese. The study finds that the verbalization frequency of Chinese color terms is approximately ten times that of English; “红” (red) is the most frequently verbalized in Chinese, while “brown” ranks highest in English. This discrepancy stems from the interaction of three aspects: firstly, the isolating characteristic of Chinese leads to fuzzy boundaries between word classes; secondly, the degrees of conventionalization of concep-tual metonymies involved in the verbalization of color terms, such as “Property for Change” and “Effect for Action”, differ between the two languages; thirdly, cultural models and experiential differences profoundly influence the semantic flexibility of color terms. This paper provides a systematic explanation for the phenomenon of grammatical transcategorization of color terms from a cognitive perspective and offers new insights for cross-linguistic comparative studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiaying Xu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: