Analysis reveals shifts in state sovereignty and government regulations regarding artificial intelligence, emphasizing economic and political factors.
Generative artificial intelligence's (GAI's) wide-ranging potential for generation, communication and dissemination of information marks an unprecedented level of transformation by challenging states with varying approaches to state sovereignty. These implications underscore the necessity of examining how states maintain control over digital territories that are being reshaped by the increasing influence of GAI. In particular, we explore how economic, political and social circumstances will shape government regulations on artificial intelligence (AI). This research highlights the importance of debate concerning how the notion of sovereignty itself may be shaped amidst the proliferation of GAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayankina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: