This research demonstrates disparities in judicial discretion on bail in Delhi, indicating challenges in upholding human rights amid national security concerns.
Key Points
Judicial discretion in bail decisions is influenced by public interest, often conflicting with individual rights.
Empirical data from High Court and district courts reveals inconsistencies in bail grant and denial based on legal frameworks.
Judicial interpretation of NDPS and UAPA emphasizes security, sometimes at the expense of human rights protections.
The study calls for uniform guidelines to harmonize bail jurisprudence and protect individual liberties across laws.