Overview highlights high-dimensional data strategies, revealing insights on PLS models with diverse datasets.
An overview of various prospective PLS‐DA strategies is presented. PLS‐DA is considered not only as a discrimination method per se but also as a method for extracting low‐dimensional features suitable for discriminating high‐dimensional data, which makes it similar to PCA. Unlike PCA, PLS‐DA extracts two sets of features: the matrix of predicted dummy responses ( Y ) and the matrix of PLS scores ( T ). Both sets are then used as input to hard (deterministic) and soft (probabilistic) discriminators, providing a wide selection of combinations. Moreover, the features can be enriched by using additional information provided by the PLS model. A total of 18 different strategies are considered, including 8 based on Y ‐features and 10 based on T ‐features. Two data sets are used to illustrate the theory, yielding the following results. Both the T ‐ and the Y ‐based approaches are comparable; additional information is ineffective. The cons and pros of each strategy are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodionova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: