Experiments reveal the spillover effect of altruistic cheating increases dishonesty in organizational contexts, suggesting deeper moral implications.
We identify a novel moral licensing mechanism: a spillover effect whereby seemingly altruistic acts increase subsequent self‐serving dishonesty. Study 1 established this spillover effect, showing that initial altruistic cheating sustains later egoistic cheating at a higher level compared to when both acts are self‐serving. Study 2 demonstrated that this effect is unidirectional. While the effect of altruistic cheating was replicated, initial egoistic cheating did not reduce later altruistic cheating. Study 3 found initial support for a moral credentials account over desensitization as the underlying mechanism. Study 4 confirmed this by showing that retroactively removing the altruistic justification eliminated the effect. The asymmetry of the spillover effect uncovers a more troubling aspect of moral licensing that undermines ethical boundaries and sustains dishonesty rather than simply enabling moral balance. Our findings expand current models of moral licensing by introducing a justification‐based process that perpetuates unethical behavior. This helps explain how well‐intentioned misconduct can escalate in individual and organizational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halevy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: