Analysis reveals conflict between environmental rights and development in Narmada Bachao Andolan case, highlighting implications for legal judgments.
This paper focuses on a perennially contentious topic “The Narmada Bachao Andolan”. It contains the whole issue from how it begins, how it moved in court of law and in what circumstances it got disposed of. This paper analyzed the case in purview of Right to Environment v. Right to Development. Along with that, this paper critically analyzed the majority judgement of Supreme Court in respect to the right of environment, development and livelihood conferred by COI to ‘we the people’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: