Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus recommendations provide guidance on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy techniques, implying improved clinical practice in pancreaticobiliary disorders.
Background and Aim Direct cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have become widely implemented techniques in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of several pancreaticobiliary disorders. This study aimed to generate general and indication‐specific European consensus recommendations on cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy. Methods Supported by the available literature, statements were formulated and grouped into the following categories: (1) pre‐procedural considerations, (2) general technical aspects, (3) biliopancreatic stones, (4) biliary strictures, and (5) other indications. The evidence level of each statement was determined using the GRADE methodology. Cholangioscopy experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi process. When 80% consensus was not reached, the statement was modified based on expert feedback and subjected to an additional Delphi round. Statements were rejected if they failed to reach consensus after three Delphi rounds. Results Thirty cholangioscopy experts completed the Delphi process. Forty‐two (97.6%) generated statements were accepted, of which 39 (92.9%) in the first Delphi round. 12 statements on preprocedural and periprocedural settings, 8 statements on biliopancreatic stones, 13 statements on biliary strictures, and 9 statements on other indications were accepted. Conclusion Using a modified Delphi process, we developed general and indication‐specific consensus recommendations for cholangioscopy to guide clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palmeri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: