Evaluation reveals artificial intelligence aids optical diagnosis in colonoscopy, with no significant performance improvement for neoplastic lesions.
Objectives: Evaluate CADx-assisted and unassisted endoscopist optical diagnosis of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), traditional serrated adenomas, and advanced adenomas. Methods: We performed an IRB-approved secondary analysis of a large prospective colonoscopy cohort. Results: Of 2111 polyps (1011 patients), 116 were histopathology-proven SSLs. Sensitivity for SSL identification of CADx-assisted and unassisted optical diagnosis was 55.7% (95%CI 42.9-67.8) and 38.6% (95%CI 22.7-57.3) respectively. Endoscopists correctly identified SSLs more frequently when CADx classified these as hyperplastic compared to neoplastic, (66.7%[95%CI 51.8-78.9] vs 24.5%[95%CI 10.8-46.3]; p<0.001). Conclusions: CADx use did neither significantly harm nor improve optical diagnostic performance for SSLs despite CADx inability to classify SSLs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oleksiw et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: