What type of study is this?

October 23, 2025Journal Of Clinical PeriodontologyOpen Access

Implantoplasty vs. Rotating Titanium Brushes in the Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis: A 1‐Year Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SPSeung‐Hyun ParkYonsei University DKDo‐Gyoon KimThe Ohio State University DKDo‐Gyoon KimThe Ohio State University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Randomised trial shows treatment outcomes for peri-implantitis in 30 patients, indicating titanium brushes may be a viable alternative to implantoplasty.

Key Points

Both treatments achieved favourable outcomes for peri-implantitis, with no significant differences in the overall results.
At 12 months, probing pocket depth improved by 3.6 mm in the titanium brush group compared to 3.3 mm in the implantoplasty group.
Surface decontamination with titanium brushes took significantly less time, averaging 3 minutes, compared to 5 minutes for the control.
The study supports the use of titanium brushes for treating peri-implantitis, highlighting non-inferiority and potential for faster application.

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f9d6583f37887222492476 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70056

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Randomised trial shows treatment outcomes for peri-implantitis in 30 patients, indicating titanium brushes may be a viable alternative to implantoplasty.

Implantoplasty vs. Rotating Titanium Brushes in the Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis: A 1‐Year Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Implantoplasty vs. Rotating Titanium Brushes in the Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis: A 1‐Year Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider