Pilot longitudinal study assesses dynamic health behaviors and sleep in youth, indicating feasibility for future research.
Background Promoting healthy behaviors including adequate sleep, regular physical activity, balanced diet, and abstinence from substance use, alongside nurturing affective functioning, may crucially support physical and mental well-being in youth. Yet, little is known about how these domains interact dynamically in their daily lives. Objective This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of prolonged, multiwave ambulatory assessment in school-recruited adolescents as well as in clinical and school-recruited preadolescents. In addition, it will examine the dynamic interplay of different health behavior domains and affective functioning in adolescent samples recruited in schools. Methods The initial target sample size was 100 youths (ages 9‐17 years) across 2 assessment protocols. Adolescents complete three 3-week waves with 4 daily ecological momentary assessments and parallel actigraphy, and preadolescents follow two 10-day assessment waves. Feasibility aims will be assessed via equivalence tests targeting an a priori level of missing data and dropout at 70% each. Dynamic modeling in adolescent datasets will be addressed by a planned multilevel analysis leveraging idiographic effects as predictors of symptom outcomes, as well as state-of-the-art exploratory frameworks. Results By July 2025, we enrolled 113 school adolescents and 27 school preadolescents exceeding the a priori target. Recruitment and data collection are still ongoing in the clinical preadolescent group of currently 13 preadolescents. Conclusions This concise, intensive longitudinal protocol provides the basis for examining the feasibility of long-term intensive longitudinal paradigms in youth and lays a critical foundation for future large-scale studies aimed at unpacking the evolving interplay of health behaviors and emotional well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drexl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: