Evaluation shows fermentation improved and nutritional quality enhanced in apple pomace silage with moisture-absorbing additives, indicating reduced losses.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of moisture-absorbing additives for the conservation of apple pomace silage, and the effects on its fermentation and nutritional quality. The dry matter content (DMC) of apple pomace was determined using a microwave oven method, which was tested and compared to the standard oven method to facilitate calculation of the apple pomace quantities required to achieve 350 g kg-1 DMC in the ensiled mass. Five treatments were evaluated in experimental silos: fresh apple pomace (FAP); FAP with ground maize grain; FAP with soybean meal; FAP with wheat bran; and FAP with soybean hulls. A randomized block experimental design was used. Data were analyzed using the R statistical program, adopting a significance level of 0.05. The DMC obtained using the microwave oven method was similar to that obtained with the standard oven method (164.4 and 156.1 g kg-1, respectively). The nutritional composition of the silages varied with additives; soybean meal increased crude protein content, while soybean hulls increased the fiber fraction (p < 0.001). The pH values were below 4.20. The addition of wheat bran resulted in 176.42 g kg-1 of ammoniacal nitrogen, indicating increased proteolysis. The incorporation of moisture-absorbing additives into apple pomace silage reduced gas losses by 20.1% and effluent losses by 65.9% (p < 0.001). Overall, the additives improved fermentation profile and reduced losses, enhancing the silage's nutritional composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fávaro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: