Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This computational framework improves accuracy in art emotion recognition by combining physiological signals and visual semantics, indicating advances in neuroaesthetics.
Emotional responses to visual art involve perceptual and physiological interactions, but existing methods isolate these modalities, limiting individualized affective modeling. This study presents BioArt-Net, a computational framework integrating visual semantic analysis and physiological signal processing for viewer-centric art emotion recognition, focusing on cross-modal fusion methodologies. Key modules: Visual semantics via fine-tuned ViT (16 × 16 patches, 32% dimensionality reduction); EEG (wavelet transform), GSR/PPG (1D CNNs) encoding with 94% data integrity; token-level attention aligning modalities; compound loss (CE + MSE + entropy) reducing redundancy by 27%; optimized via distillation (48% fewer parameters, 89 ms latency). On 520-session BioArt-Emotion Dataset, accuracy reaches 0.87 (vs 0.76 unimodal), F1 = 0.85. Cross-modal attention boosts accuracy by 11%; physiological reweighting stabilizes results. This advances computational neuroaesthetics, fitting the journal’s focus on innovative interdisciplinary frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiaoyue Hu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: