This analysis uncovers phase-field models' impact on curvature and mass diffusion in dynamic wetting scenarios, suggesting improved contact line handling.
Dynamic wetting poses a well-known challenge in classical sharp-interface formulation as the no-slip wall condition leads to a contact line singularity that is typically regularized with a Navier boundary condition, often requiring empirical fitting for the slip length. On the other hand, this paradox does not appear in phase-field models as the contact line moves through diffusive mass transport. In this work, we present a toy model that accounts for mass diffusion at the contact line within a sharp-interface framework. This model is based on a theoretical relation derived from the Cahn-Hilliard equations, which links the total diffusive mass transport to the curvature at the wall. From an estimate of the chemical potential on a curved interface, we obtain an expression for the width of the highly curved region <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mi>δ</a:mi></a:math> and the apparent angle. In the sharp-interface model, we then introduce a fictitious boundary, displaced by a distance <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mi>δ</b:mi></b:math> into the domain, where a Navier boundary condition is applied along a dynamic apparent contact angle that accounts for the local interface bending. The robustness of the model is assessed by comparing the toy model results with standard phase-field ones on two cases: the steady state profiles of a liquid bridge between two plates moving in opposite directions and the transient behaviors of a drop spreading on a solid with a prescribed equilibrium angle. This offers a practical and efficient alternative to solve contact line problems at lower cost in a sharp-interface framework with input parameters from phase-field models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fullana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Physical review. E