Analysis reveals that saliva-based testing enables rapid clinical diagnosis and genomic sequencing, supporting surveillance in pandemics.
Background/Objectives: Monitoring community health and tracking SARS-CoV-2 evolution were critical priorities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, widespread shortages of personal protective equipment, the necessity for social distancing, and the redeployment of healthcare personnel to clinical duties presented significant barriers to traditional sample collection. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of using self-collected saliva specimens for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Following confirmation of reliable viral detection in saliva, we established a large-scale surveillance program in Arizona, USA, to enable clinical diagnosis and genomic sequencing from self-collected samples. Between April 2020 and December 2023, we tested approximately 1.4 million saliva samples using RT-PCR, identifying 94,330 SARS-CoV-2 infections. Whole genome sequencing was performed on 69,595 samples, yielding 54,040 high-quality consensus genomes. Results: This surveillance approach enabled real-time monitoring of general infection trends that matched regional case counts. We monitored multiple wave-like introductions of viral lineages over the course of the pandemic. We identified three periods of S gene target failure on a commercial assay and assessed its ability to make fast, genotyping assignment during the pandemic (PPV = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97–0.99; NPV = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.94–0.96). The co-location of clinical testing and sequencing capabilities within the same facility resulted in low turnaround time from the sample collection to the generation of sequencing data (median = 12 days, IQR: 9.0–19.75). Conclusions: Our findings support the use of self-collected saliva as a scalable, cost-effective, and practical strategy for infectious disease surveillance in future pandemics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holland et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: