Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiments reveal infants do not reliably recognize language changes in bilingual speakers, suggesting limited cues for language separation.
It is a widely held belief that bilingual infants benefit from hearing each of their languages spoken by different people, as speakers could serve as a cue for separating the two languages. However, it is not yet known whether infants reliably attend to speaker-specific language use. In four experiments using looking time measures, we asked whether monolingual and bilingual infants in the U.S. could learn pairings between speakers and languages. Infants were first familiarized with two speakers, each using a different language. Then, after infants habituated, the two speakers switched languages, and we measured whether infants showed increased interest in hearing the speakers use a different language. Across all four studies, infants did not show reliable evidence that they detected a change in the language used by individual speakers, suggesting that speaker-language associations may not be a salient source of information for infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potter et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: