Analysis reveals improved durability and reduced CO2 emissions in sustainable concrete with pozzolanic additives, highlighting its potential in coastal environments.
Premature deterioration of concrete structures in coastal areas requires a careful evaluation based on durability criteria. Electrical Resistivity (ER) serves as a valuable indicator of concrete durability, as it reflects how easily aggressive agents can penetrate its pores. This testing method offers several advantages; it is non-destructive, rapid, and more cost-effective than the chloride permeability test (RCPT). Furthermore, durable concrete typically necessitates larger quantities of cement, which contradicts the goals of sustainable concrete development. Thus, a significant challenge is to create concrete that is both durable and sustainable. This research explores the effects of pozzolanic additives, specifically Volcanic Ash (VA) and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA), on the electrical resistivity of eco-friendly concretes exposed to the coastal conditions of the Gulf of Mexico. The electrical resistivity (ER) was measured at intervals of 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 56, 90, and 180 days across 180 cylinders, each with dimensions of 10 cm × 20 cm. The sustainability of the concrete was evaluated based on its energy efficiency. Three types of mixtures were developed using the ACI 211.1 method, maintaining a water-to-cement (w/c) ratio of 0.57 with CPC 30 R RS cement and incorporating various additions: (1) varying percentages of VA (2.5%, 5%, and 7.5%), (2) SCBA at rates of 5%, 10%, and 15%, and (3) ternary mixtures featuring VA-SCBA ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3. The findings indicated an increase in ER of up to 37% and a reduction in CO2 emissions ranging from 4.2% to 16.8% when compared to the control mixture, highlighting its potential for application in structures situated in aggressive environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cortés et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: