Automated system estimates burial depth and diameter in underground pipelines, suggesting improved maintenance and risk management.
Underground pipelines form a critical part of urban infrastructure, yet their complex configurations and fragmented documentation hinder efficient maintenance and risk management. Ground-penetrating radar provides a non-invasive method for subsurface inspection; however, traditional interpretation of B-scan data relies heavily on manual analysis, which is time-consuming and prone to error. This research proposes a two-step automated system for the detection and quantitative characterization of underground pipelines from GPR B-scans. In the first step, hyperbolic reflections are automatically detected and localized using state-of-the-art object detection algorithms, where YOLOv11x achieved superior stability compared to RT-DETR-X. In the second step, detected hyperbolic reflections are processed in order to estimate key parameters, including two-way travel time, burial depth, pipeline diameter, and the angle between GPR survey line and pipeline. Experimental results from 5-fold cross-validation demonstrate that TWTT and burial depth can be estimated with high performance, while pipeline diameter and angle exhibit moderate performance, reflecting their higher complexity and sensitivity to noise. According to the experimental results, EfficientNetV2L consistently produced the best overall performance. The proposed automated system reduces reliance on manual inspection, improves efficiency, and establishes a foundation for real-time, autonomous GPR-based underground infrastructure assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Štifanić et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: