Systematic review finds stigma impacts support for nurses facing medical mistakes, indicating need for better referral systems.
Background: The second victim syndrome is the intense emotional and professional damage caused to nurses by medical mistakes, but supporting mechanisms, particularly referral processes, are rudimentary. Aim: This review synthesizes evidence concerning referral processes among second victim nurses, examining their feasibility, limitations, and innovations to inform fair and effective support interventions. Methods: An integrative review was conducted searching PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000–2025) for peer-reviewed articles on second victim nurses. Forty sources, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies, were reviewed for themes of referral mechanisms, using thematic analysis and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal instruments. Results: Referral automation happens in a mere 18% of organizations, with low awareness (74.8% unfamiliarity) and stigma as points of hindrance. Active models like MUHC's pager system and coordinated pathways bring rise to uptake, while innovations like the Talk to Me program achieve 100% uptake. Virtual programs externally (e.g., YANA) are 80% possible in under-resourced settings. Conclusion: Proactive, just culture-based referral systems are crucial to enabling second victim nurses, preventing distress, and enhancing patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abuallah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: