Observational analysis reveals hysteresis effects on sea ice due to global warming, indicating risks of carbon dioxide removal strategies.
Abstract Limiting global warming to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels is central to the Paris Agreement, yet temporary overshoots of this target are increasingly likely. While the global mean surface temperature could return to 1.5°C through mitigation and carbon dioxide removal, the regional consequences of overshoot remain uncertain. We use the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1.0-LL) to compare a policy-relevant moderate overshoot scenario—peaking at 1.8°C before cooling to 1.5°C by 2100—with a no-overshoot pathway. We show that, despite similar global temperatures by 2100, the Arctic exhibits significant hysteresis, with ~ 18% less sea ice and ~ 1°C higher near-surface temperatures under overshoot. Using a zonal energy balance model and radiative kernel analysis, we identify sea ice–albedo and lapse rate feedbacks as dominant drivers of this, while heat transport plays a minor role. These findings provide the first mechanistic attribution of Arctic hysteresis under a moderate overshoot scenario, highlighting the risks of delayed mitigation and the importance of avoiding even temporary exceedance of temperature targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Archibald et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: