October 27, 2025Golden Ratio of Data in SummaryOpen Access

Prosecutorial Evidence Efforts in Juvenile Violent Theft Cases: A Case Study at the Medan District Prosecutor’s Office

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ASAri Iswandy SihombingUniversity of HKBP Nommensen HSHisar SiregarUniversity of HKBP Nommensen

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Case study shows the Public Prosecutor faced challenges in providing evidence for juvenile theft, indicating implications for legal certainty and justice.

Key Points

The case revealed that unemployment significantly contributes to juvenile violent theft.
Key evidence included testimonies and adherence to legal standards under Article 184.
Challenges faced by the Public Prosecutor included uncooperative defendants and low public awareness.
Sufficient evidence led to a conviction with a sentence of 1 year and 6 months, highlighting the need for legal clarity.

Cite This Study

Sihombing et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ff87e2c8c50a61f2bdcd78 https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i4.1797

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Case study shows the Public Prosecutor faced challenges in providing evidence for juvenile theft, indicating implications for legal certainty and justice.

Prosecutorial Evidence Efforts in Juvenile Violent Theft Cases: A Case Study at the Medan District Prosecutor’s Office

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Prosecutorial Evidence Efforts in Juvenile Violent Theft Cases: A Case Study at the Medan District Prosecutor’s Office

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider