Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals higher education reflects and influences politics and national identity, suggesting complex contestation in development.
Higher education plays a double role vis-à-vis the nation. It is a mirror of a nation’s politics, reflecting the needs and aspirations of a populace and a government. Simultaneously, it is an instrument of those very politics, operating not just as a set of institutions where teaching and learning happen, but a locus of national identity, legitimation, economic and scientific action, and societal progress. The seven articles in this issue are shining reminders of these dynamics and, most importantly, evidence that the mirror/instrument dual identity extends across vastly different contexts of time, geography, and nationhood. At the same time, the articles make clear that the process of developing that identity is hardly natural or automatic. It is instead the fruit of contestation, extending my own remarks on the higher education system in the United States: “It is the product of contests and compromises, attacks and counterattacks, ideas and exigencies” (Ris, 2022).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ethan W. Ris (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: