Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows improved supply chain optimization using predictive analytics in Afghanistan, indicating safer humanitarian aid delivery.
Operating in conflict zones, humanitarian organizations are exposed to insecurity, broken supply chains, and unpredictable political environments. These complexities are seen in Afghanistan, which needs new, data-driven logistics approaches. This study proposes a predictive analytics framework based on ensemble machine learning models, Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking to predict fatalities, demonstration events, and high-risk areas to support humanitarian logistics, supply chain optimization, and corridor management in Afghanistan. As a method, it applies conflict data to geospatial and temporal variables to predict security risks well. Predictive outcomes revealed peak risk times and places, which were useful in making logical decisions, optimizing resources, and increasing the safety of humanitarian corridors. The framework’s reliability was validated using evaluation metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and classification accuracy. This research is significant because it applies predictive analytics theory to real logistical scenarios with a scalable model that can be used by other humanitarian organizations. The main limitations of the study include the small area of analysis, the absence of socio-economic variables in the analysis, and the lack of integration of real-time data. Future work should include the integration of real-time data streams, extension of the geographical coverage, and the integration of dynamic socio-economic and political variables to improve the accuracy of the prediction model. This study effectively enables peak risk periods and locations to be pinpointed, which in turn enables better targeted interventions to improve the safety of humanitarian workers and reach vulnerable populations on time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parmadia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: