Observational analysis identified biomarkers predicting hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B and C, highlighting the value of PIVKA-II and AFP.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently develops in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Early detection is critical, but current methods, including ultrasound and AFP, have suboptimal accuracy. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing, alone and in combination, for HCC development. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a single university center included 242 CHB and 181 CHC patients. Data on demographics, clinical status, laboratory parameters, and imaging were collected, with fibrosis and steatosis assessed by FibroScan®. Serum AFP and PIVKA-II were measured, but measurements of PIVKA-II in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists were excluded from the analysis. HCC diagnosis and staging followed clinical guidelines. Cox regression and ROC analyses identified independent predictors and evaluated biomarker accuracy for HCC detection. Results: HCC incidence was comparable between cohorts (5.0% in CHB vs. 5.5% in CHC). Both AFP and PIVKA-II independently predicted HCC development in multivariate models adjusted for age and sex. The combined biomarker score (AFP × PIVKA-II) showed superior predictive accuracy with hazard ratios of 1.38 (CHB) and 1.36 (CHC). ROC analyses demonstrated high discriminative ability for PIVKA-II (AUC ~0.81) and AFP (AUC ~0.83) in both cohorts. Additional independent predictors were chronic alcohol abuse, cirrhosis, and higher liver stiffness measurements. Specific viral factors such as HBeAg positivity and HCV subgenotype 1b were also associated with increased HCC risk. Conclusions: AFP and PIVKA-II are independent, valuable biomarkers for HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B and C. Combined use improves early detection, aiding timely treatment. These results support adding PIVKA-II to AFP in surveillance, but larger studies are needed to confirm the findings and refine cut-off values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milošević et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: