Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the significance of stylistics in knowledge preparation for Qian Qianyi's reprint, suggesting new connections between texts in Buddhism.
Zhikong's self written “Diary of Zhikong Master in Guanglong Temple” and “Ode to Juexi”, as well as Zhikong's writings “Key News of Anle Collection” and “Annotations on the Wuliangshou Sutra”, are helpful in examining Zhikong's knowledge preparation before reprinting Qian Qianyi's “Lengyan Mengchao”. Zhikong's reprinting Qian Qianyi's “Lengyan Mengchao” was carried out in the atmosphere that Daiya Benyuan Temple advocates cultivation. Related to the promotion of the Kepan of Changshui's “Shoulengyan Yishu Zhujing”, Zhikong's “Lunzhuyijie” and Qian Qianyi's “Lengyan Mengchao” are quite similar in their emphasis on the theory of Changxingjiesong, which suggests that Changshui's Kepan and the theory of Changxingjiesong are important knowledge preparations for Zhikong to reprint the “Lengyan Mengchao”. In the 17th and 18th centuries, both Chinese and Japanese Buddhist studies showed a trend of close interaction between Buddhist commentaries and Stylistics. 知空自筆《光隆寺知空師追日記》和《絕息頌》、 知空撰《安樂集鑰聞》、 《無量壽經論注翼解》等史料, 有助於考察知空翻刻錢謙益《楞嚴蒙鈔》之前的知識準備。 知空翻刻錢謙益《楞嚴蒙鈔》的舉措, 是在淨土真宗的大谷本願寺一派崇尚修學的風氣下進行的。 與推崇長水《首楞嚴義疏注經》的科判相關聯, 知空《論注翼解》與錢謙益《楞嚴蒙鈔》在重視長行偈頌論方面頗為接近, 這就提示了長水科判和長行偈頌論是知空翻刻《楞嚴蒙鈔》的重要知識準備。 十七至十八世紀中日佛學都呈現出佛典註疏與文章學密切互動的趨勢。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenglan Wu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: