Cross-sectional analysis reveals improved surgical outcomes in corneal blindness management, suggesting resource allocation needs.
Background: Corneal blindness is a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly in resource-constrained countries with limited access to specialized ophthalmic care. Keratoplasty is one of the essential treatment approaches for rehabilitating vision in patients with corneal pathologies. Aims: The primary aim of the study was to assess the challenges faced during penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and the outcomes of surgeries in a resource-constrained country in the absence of a domestic eye bank. The secondary aim was to assess the outcomes of PK. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study included patients undergoing PK for various corneal pathologies at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, between January and March 2025. Results: PK was performed in 42 patients (27 (64.3%) male and 15 (35.7%) female), with a mean age of 33.9 ± 20.9 years. The right eye was involved in 16 (38.1%) patients, while bilateral cases were 13 (31.0%). The leading cause for PK was keratoconus with very low best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (n = 15, 35.7%), followed by non-traumatic corneal opacity. The waiting period for surgery was >20 months in 31 (73.8%) patients. After PK, the patients who achieved BCVA >6/60 increased from two (4.8%) at one-day follow-up to 29 (69.1%) at six-month follow-up. The major challenge in PK was a lack of surgical tools in 33 (78.6%) patients and a delay in donor tissue availability in 30 (71.4%) patients. Conclusion: Visual acuity was significantly improved after PK, particularly at long follow-up periods. The major challenge in PK was the lack of surgical tools and the delay in donor tissue availability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahil et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: