Analysis demonstrates enhanced ductility and energy dissipation in aluminium-core braces, suggesting improved seismic performance.
Abstract The Buckling-Restrained Knee Braced-Truss Moment Frame (BRKB-TMF) is a novel seismic force-resisting system that offers several advantages over conventional truss moment frames. It can be designed per Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) methodology to confine inelastic activities to the Buckling-Restrained Braces (BRBs) and column bases, whereas keeping all other structural elements in the elastic range. An innovative BRB with an annealed aluminium core was developed and experimentally tested at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. This aluminium-core BRB exhibits significantly higher ductility than conventional steel-core BRBs and demonstrates pronounced hardening and energy dissipation capacity. However, this increased hardening behaviour can lead to excessive overstrength in the designed frame, potentially resulting in an uneconomical design. To address this issue, this study proposes a BRB hardening correction factor ( η ) into the existing PBPD procedure for BRKB-TMFs. The proposed modification reduces frame overstrength and generalizes the PBPD methodology, making it applicable regardless of BRB type by accounting for BRB hardening effects. A four-story prototype building was designed using the modified PBPD procedure, incorporating both aluminium-core and steel-core BRBs-referred to hereafter as Al-BRB and Steel-BRB frames, respectively-and their performance was evaluated and compared. Nonlinear pushover analysis confirmed that both frames exhibited excellent performance, with inelastic activities confined to the BRBs and column bases. To evaluate collapse performance, fragility curves were developed using incremental dynamic analysis with three intensity measures: spectral acceleration, peak ground acceleration, and peak ground velocity. The fragility curves for both frames were closely aligned for all intensity measures, indicating their similar dynamic characteristics and validating the general applicability of the proposed design methodology. The adjusted collapse margin ratio was found to be 3.02 for the Al-BRB frame and 1.76 for the Steel-BRB frame, demonstrating the superior collapse resistance of the Al-BRB frame.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: