Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis demonstrates a 39% reduction in energy consumption for thermal management systems in electric vehicles, implying improved driving range.
Widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is hindered by "range anxiety," a major concern for consumers. A primary contributor to this issue is the significant energy consumption of the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system, which can account for 15-40% of a vehicle's total energy demand, directly reducing its practical driving range. Using the 1D simulation tool GT-SUITE, this research provides a comparative analysis of two distinct HVAC architectures: a conventional air-cooled condenser (ACC) and a proposed liquid-cooled condenser (LCC). The performance of both hardware systems was evaluated under two control strategies a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller and a basic On/Off controller—to identify the optimal configuration. The results advocate that optimizing the system's architecture and control logic yields a substantial improvement in the Coefficient of Performance (COP) ranging from 47% to 128% compared to the baseline ACC/On-Off configuration, with a corresponding total energy consumption reduction of 10% to 39%. Critically, these significant performance gains were analyzed for both the R134a and the modern, low-GWP R1234yf refrigerants This research confirms that a holistic optimization approach, improving both hardware and control logic, is a robust strategy for significantly reducing HVAC energy load, proven effective for both the refrigerants. By quantifying these substantial energy savings, this study provides a clear pathway for designing more sustainable EV thermal management systems that can help extend driving range and address a key barrier to EV adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakshith et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: