Analysis of K-feldspar geochemistry suggests lithium mineralization patterns in aplite-pegmatites, indicating exploration potential.
Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis was conducted to examine the geochemical composition of K-feldspars from various aplite-pegmatites in the Barroso-Alvão field, focusing on the differences between Li-rich and Li-barren aplite-pegmatites. The study revealed significant variations in the concentrations of minor and trace elements (Rb, Tl, Li, Ga, Pb, Cs, Ba, Be, Ta, and Sn) present in the K-feldspars of Li-barren, spodumene-rich, and petalite-rich aplite-pegmatites. The data also indicate a geographical trend in both mineralogy and geochemistry across the aplite-pegmatites of the Barroso-Alvão field. Li-barren aplite-pegmatites are more concentrated in the southeast, spodumene-rich dominate the center, and petalite-rich varieties are more common in the northwest. Additionally, portable X-ray fluorescence analysis was performed on the crystals of the same samples to evaluate the feasibility of in situ geochemical analysis of K-feldspars, aiming to determine whether an aplite-pegmatite can be quickly identified as Li-rich. This approach seeks to provide a rapid field assessment of whether an aplite-pegmatite justifies further exploration for Li mining. Notably, the trace amounts of Li, Sn, P, and Ta found in K-feldspars are likely due to mineral inclusions of spodumene, cassiterite, apatite, and columbite–tantalite minerals, as observed petrographically in one of these Li-rich aplite-pegmatites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dias et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: