Review highlights gene therapy efficacy and delivery systems for inherited retinal diseases, suggesting improved safety and precision in clinical applications.
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous spectrum of disorders that lead to progressive and irreversible vision loss. Gene therapy is the most promising emerging treatment for IRDs. While gene augmentation strategies have demonstrated clinical benefit and results within the first approved ocular gene therapy, their application is restricted by adeno-associated virus (AAV) packaging capacity and limited efficacy for dominant mutations. Recent breakthroughs in precision genome editing, particularly base editing (BE) and prime editing (PE), have provided alternatives capable of directly correcting pathogenic variants. BE enables targeted single-nucleotide conversions, whereas PE further allows for precise insertions and deletions, both circumventing the double-strand DNA cleavage or repair processes typically induced by conventional CRISPR–Cas editing systems, thereby offering advantages in post-mitotic retinal cells. Preclinical investigations across murine and non-human primate models have demonstrated the feasibility, molecular accuracy, and preliminary safety profiles of these platforms in targeting IRD-associated mutations. However, critical challenges remain before clinical application can be realized, including limited editing efficiency in photoreceptors, interspecies variability in therapeutic response, potential risks of off-target effects, and barriers in large-scale vector manufacturing. Moreover, the delivery of genome editors to the outer retina remains suboptimal, prompting intensive efforts in capsid engineering and the development of non-viral delivery systems. This review synthesizes the current progress in BE and PE optimization, highlights innovations in delivery platforms that encompass viral and emerging non-viral systems and summarizes the major barriers to clinical translation. We further discuss AI-driven strategies for the rational design of BE/PE systems, thereby outlining their future potential and perspectives in the treatment of IRDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: