New ergonomic assessment method reduces risk of musculoskeletal strain in workers in narrow spaces, supporting better occupational health practices.
Work performed in confined and low-height spaces (NSLH) is relatively common across several industries, yet it has not been adequately addressed from an ergonomic perspective. Such activities require workers to adopt awkward postures, most often with the trunk bent and rotated, while handling loads positioned at varying distances from the body. These conditions lead to rapid fatigue, musculoskeletal strain, and, in the long term, may cause serious health disorders. Traditional ergonomic risk assessment methods, such as REBA, RULA, or QEC, were initially applied in these situations; however, the results were unsatisfactory. Their broad applicability and reliance on calculation tables that incorporate factors irrelevant to NSLH tasks prevent them from providing an accurate evaluation of ergonomic risks in these environments. To overcome these limitations, a new assessment method, RALH (Risk Assessment for Narrow Spaces with Low Height), was developed. The method aims to evaluate ergonomic risks in contexts where workers cannot maintain an upright posture, resulting in significant stress on the spinal column, particularly in the lumbar and cervical regions. The RALH methodology incorporates parameters such as trunk inclination, trunk rotation, load weight, distance between the body and the load, exposure duration, and the worker’s physical fitness. A dedicated software tool, ERGO Agent—RALH, was designed to implement this methodology, providing structured data collection, parameter normalization, and ergonomic risk calculation. Case studies, including distribution agents working inside van cargo compartments, demonstrated that the method produces accurate and objective results. Beyond diagnosis, RALH also supports the development of preventive strategies, such as equipment optimization, task allocation, worker training, and physical conditioning. Overall, the RALH method is a practical tool for improving occupational health and efficiency in NSLH environments, where traditional ergonomic approaches are insufficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ispășoiu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: