Application of Hydraulic Safety Evaluation Indices to Waterfront Facilities in Floodplains

Climate change has intensified torrential rainfall and floods, causing frequent floodplain inundation with erosion and deposition. Large-scale waterfront facilities such as park golf courses are highly vulnerable, requiring systematic hydraulic safety evaluation. We simulated a recent flood in the Musim Stream using a two-dimensional FaSTMECH model to assess floodplain safety. The model showed excellent reproducibility (RMSE = 0.0176 m, NSE = 0.95 for depth; RMSE = 0.016 m/s, NSE = 0.87 for velocity). Flood risk indices—flood intensity (FI) and flood hazard rating (FHR)—and erosion–deposition indices—transient erosion and deposition index (TEDI) and steady erosion and deposition index (SEDI)—were applied. FI values were in the range of 0.3–6.4 (median 2.8) and FHR was in the range 0.7–10.2 (median 3.0), indicating that most floodplain areas exceeded the “high” to “extreme” risk range. TEDI was in the range of 0.004–4.15 (mean = 0.60), while SEDI was in the range of 0.001–5.59 (mean = 2.12). High TEDI values (0.6–0.9) occurred in curved and contracted sections, corresponding to observed erosion zones, whereas high SEDI values (0.8–1.0) were concentrated in the main channel. These results demonstrate that the indices effectively quantify and visualize floodplain risk, providing a practical basis for the design, placement, and maintenance of floodplain facilities.